Daily Archives: February 17, 2013

Without name on loan, widows are vulnerable

How did Wells Fargo acquire the interest in Vance property? Original lender was Universal Home Mortgage Company/Lennar Corp. Interesting no assignment filed at all or prior to the Lis Pendens The Florida Default Law Group P.L. filed back in 9/2010. See for yourself. Click here.

BRADENTON – Sandra Vance had her Cypress Bend home built with her physical limitations in mind.

Osteoporosis prevents the East Bradenton widow from climbing a flight of stairs. Chronic bronchitis makes it difficult breathing around carpets, prompting Vance to break out in vicious coughing attacks from the allergens in the fibers.

Now 72, she expected to spend life’s final chapter in the single-story home with tile floors and electric appliances — installed because gas fumes make her too dizzy to stand.

But the nation’s largest loan servicer now contends Vance must leave that all behind after a three-year foreclosure saga — one that her husband did not live through — revealed problems with the promissory note.

Vance is not alone. Legal experts say similar paperwork mistakes are poised to evict hundreds, if not thousands, of elderly windows throughout Florida from their dream retirement homes.

“It’s just horrible,” said Kathy Vance, Sandra’s daughter. “I know my mother may lose this house. But we will not go without a fight.”

Like many recession-battered borrowers, Wells Fargo filed suit against Vance’s late husband after the couple fell behind on their payments.

When her husband, Merle, died, Vance lost the authority to assume the mortgage — even though she is listed as an owner on the property’s deed.

That is because her name was never on the promissory note tied to the home’s loan — a strategy sometimes employed to obtain better financing rates by listing only her husband’s income and credit history.

But now, Vance cannot legally defend against the default.

Read on.

Deadly Clear

MERS 3-STOOGESA landmark decision was made this week in Culhane v. Aurora in the United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit without a complete set of facts set out before what  appears to be its clueless judges.

The case decision, an APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS was to some degree based on the merits of standing answering the question: “Whether a mortgagor has standing to challenge the assignment of her mortgage — an assignment to which she is not a party and of which she is not a third-party beneficiary — is a matter of first impression for this court.”

View original post 1,870 more words

Is This Where The Secret JP Morgan London Gold Vault Is Located?


After all it is the London Billion Market Association. Not New York, Zurich or Singapore.

Why is London such an integral part of the gold financial world? We’ll let none other than JPMorgan explain:

The characteristics of the London market uniquely support the use of gold as collateral by ensuring:

  • Quality and liquidity: “London Good Delivery” sets the standard for gold quality. Rigorous specifications as to size and purity ensure that each London ood Delivery gold bar meets pre-set standards with little to no variation between one bar and the next. This consistency ensures that counterparties will receive gold of an expected quality (99.5% fine), which allows the metal to be easily transferred between members of the London Bullion Market. Ultimately, this facilitates trading and market liquidity—both desirable attributes for collateral.
  • Flexibility: The London gold market uses both unallocated and allocated gold. In layman’s terms, allocated gold specifically identifies each gold bar with a specific owner. Allocated gold is essentially held in separate accounts; it cannot be pooled with gold from others to satisfy obligations. In contrast, unallocated gold is held in a general pool by the bullion dealer and the customer has a general entitlement to the metal, but not to a specific gold bar. The LMBA states that unallocated gold “is the most convenient, cheapest and most commonly used method of holding the metal.”In practical terms, unallocated gold is comparable to putting dollars, pounds or euros into the bank. Once deposited, the money becomes fungible—you can withdraw the same amount of money you put in, but you will not receive back the same exact bills that you deposited. The use of unallocated gold allows for amounts smaller than a gold bar to be used as collateral between counterparties—a significant benefit to a collateral program given that a London Good Delivery bar weighs 438.9 ounces, and gold is currently trading for over US$1,700 per ounce.
  • Transparency: Readily available price information promotes market transparency and aids in daily mark-to-market and margin calculations. Gold is priced by the market twice daily (morning and afternoon) and widely reported by both the financial press and data vendors. Use of a predictable daily price fix point allows counterparties to mitigate their daily exposure and set haircuts to manage ongoing price fluctuations. The afternoon U.S. Dollar London old Fix is viewed by market participants as the appropriate way to mark gold given daily price fluctuations and increasing values.
  • Ease of transfer: The London Bullion Market clears daily using paper transfers that evidence the unallocated gold held between members. This allows them to simply and efficiently settle mutual trades and transfers to/from third parties while mitigating the costs and risks associated with physical movement of bullion. The use of paper transfers and unallocated gold facilitate easy transfers between counterparties when needed.

And speaking of JP Morgan, incidentally the subject of this post, what do we know about their London-based gold vault services? Once again, in their words:

J.P. Morgan recently integrated its gold vaulting service in London with its tri-party collateral agency service.

  • J.P. Morgan operates one of the two largest commercial gold vaults in London (one of only six in the City) and is a member of the London gold clearing system.
  • J.P. Morgan is also one of the few truly global providers of collateral management services. As collateral agent, J.P. Morgan works with two parties that have an established collateralized lending or financing arrangement.


From the Non-Prosecution Agreement…

This Agreement shall have a term of two years from the date of this Agreement, except as specifically provided below. It is understood that for the two-year term of this Agreement, LPS shall: (a) commit no crime whatsoever; (b) truthfully and completely disclose non-privileged information with respect to the activities of LPS, its officers and employees, and others concerning all matters about which the Government inquires of it, which information can be used for any purpose, except as otherwise limited in this Agreement; (c) bring to the Government’s attention all potentially criminal conduct by LPS or any of its employees that relates to violations of U.S. laws (i) concerning fraud or (ii) concerning mortgage or foreclosure document execution services; and (d) bring to the Government’s attention all criminal or regulatory investigations, administrative proceedings or civil actions brought by any governmental authority in the United States against LPS, its subsidiaries, or its employees that alleges fraud or violations of the laws governing mortgage orforeclosure document execution services.

Until the date upon which all investigations and prosecutions arising out of the conduct described in this Agreement are concluded, whether or not they are finished within the two-year term specified in the preceding paragraph, LPS shall, in connection with any investigation or prosecution arising out of the conduct described in this Agreement:

(a) cooperate fully with the Government, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and any other law enforcement or government agency designated by the Government;

(b) assist the Government in any investigation or prosecution by providing logistical and technical support for any meeting, interview, grand jury proceeding, or any trial or other court proceeding;

(c) use its best efforts promptly to secure the attendance and truthful statements or testimony of any officer, agent or employee at any meeting or interview or before the grand jury or at any trial or other court proceeding; and

(d) provide the Government, upon request, all non-privileged information, documents, records, or other tangible evidence about which the Government or any designated law enforcement or government agency inquires.

It is understood that, if the Government determines in its sole discretion that LPS has committed any crime subsequent to the date of this Agreement, or that LPS has given false, incomplete, or misleading testimony or information at any time, or that LPS has otherwise violated any provision of this Agreement, LPS shall thereafter be subject to prosecution for any federal violation of which the Government has knowledge, including perjury and obstruction of justice. Any such prosecution that is not time-barred by the applicable statute of limitations on the date ofthe signing of this Agreement may be commenced against LPS,notwithstanding the expiration of the statute of limitations between the signing of this Agreement and the expiration of the term of the Agreement plus one year. Thus, by signing this Agreement, LPS agrees that the statute of limitations with respect to any prosecution based on the facts set forth in Appendix A that is not time-barred on the date that this Agreement is signed shall be tolled for the term of this Agreement plus one year.

It is understood that, if the Government determines in its sole discretion that LPS has committed any crime after signing this Agreement, or that LPS has given false, incomplete, or misleading testimony or information at any time, or that LPS has otherwise violated any provision of this Agreement: (a) all statements made by LPS or any of its employees to the Government or other designated law enforcement agents, including Appendix A, and any testimony given by LPS or any of its employees before a grand jury or other tribunal, whether prior or subsequent to the signing of this Agreement, and any leads derived from such statements or testimony, shall be admissible in evidence in any criminal proceeding brought against LPS; and (b) LPS shall assert no claim under the United States Constitution, any statute, Rule 410 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or any other federal rule that such statements or any leads derived therefrom are inadmissible or should be suppressed. By signing this Agreement, LPS waives all rights in the foregoing respects.

Full Non-Prosecution Agreement below…