Fannie, Freddie, FHA settle MBS lawsuit with BofA
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Finance Agency reached an agreement with Bank of America (BAC) to settle claims associated with non-agency mortgage-related securities from 2005 to 2007.
Under the agreement, Bank of America will pay Fannie $4.4 billion to satisfy all claims and buyback private label securities from Fannie with an unpaid principal balance of approximately $1.9 billion.
Meanwhile, Bank of America will pay Freddie $5.1 billion.
According to the FHFA, the agreement provides for an aggregate payment of approximately $9.33 billion by Bank of America that includes the litigation resolution as well as a purchase of securities by Bank of America from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
“FHFA has acted under its statutory mandate to recover losses incurred by the companies and American taxpayers and has concluded that this resolution represents a reasonable and prudent settlement of these cases,” said FHFA Director Mel Watt said.
Wells Fargo To Pay $15M In Wage-and-Hour MDL
Law360, New York (March 26, 2014, 1:58 PM ET) — Wells Fargo & Co. will fork over $15 million to settle the claims of nearly 4,500 home mortgage consultants in a collective action in Texas federal court alleging that the bank and its predecessors failed to pay them overtime, according to documents filed Tuesday.
Exclusive: Bank of America, ex-CEO Lewis settle NY lawsuit over Merrill
Kenneth Lewis, who turned Bank of America Corp into the nation’s largest bank but also saddled it with enormous losses tied to mortgages, has settled a lawsuit accusing him of deceiving investors about one of his biggest acquisitions: Merrill Lynch & Co.
Lewis, the bank’s chief executive from 2001 to 2009, will pay $10 million to resolve claims by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman that he misled shareholders and the government in order to complete the merger, which closed on January 1, 2009, according to a copy of the agreement obtained by Reuters.
New York accused Lewis of concealing Merrill’s mounting losses from Bank of America shareholders prior to a December 5, 2008 vote on the merger, and manipulating the U.S. government into providing an extra $20 billion bailout by falsely claiming that he would back out of the merger without the money.
As part of the agreement, Lewis, 66, will also be barred for three years from serving as an officer or director of a public company. It is unclear whether insurance will cover his payment.
Bank of America will pay $15 million to resolve its portion of the lawsuit by Schneiderman, who inherited the case from his predecessor, Andrew Cuomo, now New York’s governor. The bank also will adopt reforms, such as creating a special committee to review large acquisitions, according to a separate settlement agreement obtained by Reuters.
Both payments would cover the costs of Schneiderman’s investigation, and neither Lewis nor Bank of America are admitting wrongdoing or paying damages.
Fed bars shareholder payout plans from Citi, four other banks
The Federal Reserve said Citigroup Inc’s ability to plan to cope with stressful scenarios is still not sufficient, and it nixed the bank’s plans to return more capital to shareholders, dealing a blow to a bank still fixing itself after the financial crisis.
The decision marks the second time in three years that the bank has failed to win the Fed’s approval for plan to return money to shareholders, known as the “capital plan.” The bank’s ability to return money to shareholders through buying back shares is critical for its meeting a key target for profitability.
Shares of Citi fell 4.5 percent to $47.90 in after-hours trading on Wednesday.
Winning regulatory approval for the bank’s capital plan is crucial for the credibility of Citigroup Chief Executive Michael Corbat, who was charged with improving the bank’s relationship with regulators when he took over as CEO in October 2012.
On Wednesday, the Fed said that Citigroup has improved its risk management practices in recent years, but the bank cannot determine well enough how its revenue and income would be hurt under stressful scenarios around the world. The bank’s internal examination process does not sufficiently consider how global crises could influence its broad number of businesses, the Fed added.
In 2012, the Fed rejected the plan of by its chief executive Vikram Pandit, a step that contributed to his ouster in October of that year. In the 2012 test, Citigroup did not prove to the Fed’s satisfaction that it could adequately measure risk in loans to some consumers in South East Asia, where credit rating standards are not as well developed as in the United States, according to a person familiar with the matter.
The Fed said on Wednesday that some of Citigroup’s deficiencies had been “previously identified by supervisors as requiring attention” and that “there was not sufficient improvement.”
Citigroup has been paying a quarterly dividend of 1 cent per share since 2011, which
COMPLAINT | COUNTY OF COOK V. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. ET AL | DEFENDANTS DISCRIMINATED AGAINST FHA PROTECTED MINORITY BORROWERS IN ORIGINATING PREDATORY MORTGAGE LOAN PRODUCTS
uNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK, Plaintiff, vs. HSBC NORTH AMERICA HOLDINGS INC., HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, HSBC MORTGAGE CORPORATION (USA HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES INC., HSBC USA INC., HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BENEFICIAL COMPANY LLC, DECISION ONE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LLC, HFC COMPANY LLC Defendants.
Hedge Funds Unlikely Saviors for New York-Area Homeowners
Louis Ragusa, who hasn’t paid hismortgage in two years, says he now has a chance to save his Blackwood, New Jersey, home from foreclosure after a hedge fund bought the loan.
American Homeowner Preservation, a Chicago-based investment firm, purchased the mortgage for less than half of what Ragusa owed. Chief Executive Officer Jorge Newbery called the father of three in August with an offer: Pay $5,000 and the company will drop theforeclosure case and erase the more than $100,000 of unpaid principal and penalties amassed.
“They’re a lot more flexible than a bank,” said Ragusa, 48, who ran into financial trouble after losing his job in collections for a cable company in 2007. “They can work with you because they’re a private company and they can basically set their own rules.”
“The system of banking we have both equally and ever reprobated. I contemplate it as a blot left in all our constitutions, which,
if not covered, will end in their destruction, which is already hit by the gamblers in corruption, and is sweeping away in its
progress the fortunes and morals of our citizens. … And I sincerely believe, with you, that banking establishments are more
dangerous than standing armies; and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding,
is but swindling futurity on a large scale.” — Thomas Jefferson – Letter to John Taylor, May 26, 1816