Daily Archives: May 3, 2014

WikiLeaks admits they advised Edward Snowden to seek Putin’s protection


U.S. Secret Service presses DOJ for several senior bankers’ arrests for MBS Fraud

U.S. Secret Service presses DOJ for several senior bankers’ arrests for MBS Fraud

The U.S. Secret Service is pressing the Department of Justice to file criminal charges against several senior bankers for their roles in marketing shoddy mortgage-backed securities on the eve of the financial crisis.

It’s unclear which executives or banks the Secret Service is targeting. The agency’s pursuit of the matter apparently stems from a concern that individual bankers have been able to avoid criminal charges for their roles in violating mortgage-securitization and foreclosure rules, even as other government entities have secured huge civil settlements from many of the nation’s largest banks.

Sources said the Secret Service’s financial-crimes task force is in ongoing discussions with officials at the Justice Department on the matter.

“They’re working on a huge case out of New York, and there could be arrests,” one source said. “The fact there haven’t been any [arrests] to date in any of these cases has irked a lot of people. The Secret Service has the jurisdiction to investigate, but it’s going to be up to the U.S. Attorney to push it.”

Aside from providing protection for the President and other U.S. officials, the Secret Service is charged with investigating financial crimes including counterfeiting, money laundering and financial-institution fraud.

The agency is among several that have worked with the Justice Department and various U.S. Attorneys in different states as part of a task force investigating the sales of faulty mortgage securities that ultimately contributed to the financial crisis. The Secret Service also has been involved in dozens of state-level prosecutions, including a investigation in western Pennsylvania that resulted in prison terms for several mortgage brokers and appraisers this year.

But of the 13 major settlements reached thus far with various banks over failed mortgage securities and questionable foreclosure practices — among them, Bank of America, Citigroup, J.P. Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo — there have been no criminal prosecutions. That’s due in large part to the position of Attorney General Eric Holder that civil prosecutions are preferable to criminal convictions, which he believes could have too much of a negative effect on the banks.

But that position appears to be shifting. There’s been growing friction among law-enforcement agencies, including the Secret Service, over the lack of criminal prosecutions in the biggest cases. And with the last remaining settlements currently being negotiated with banks including BofA and Citi, the Justice Department recently has signaled that it’s open to pursuing criminal probes — mindful of a five-year statute of limitations on such cases.

That window, which already has expired in a majority of cases, can be extended as long as a grand jury has been seated. “The Justice Department didn’t want to do it before, but now it looks like with time running out, they finally want to [prosecute] some people,” the source said.


Major proxy-advisory firm Glass Lewis Gives Goldman Sachs “F” Grade on Pay for Performance Policies

Major proxy-advisory firm Glass Lewis Gives Goldman Sachs “F” Grade on Pay for Performance Policies

Goldman Sachs Group Inc.GS -0.93%’s executive pay plan drew a failing grade from a major proxy-advisory firm, which urged shareholders to vote against a nonbinding proposal to approve executive pay included in the New York-based investment bank’s proxy statement.

The “F” Glass, Lewis handed out for Goldman Sachs’s pay-for-performance policies marks a deterioration from the “D” grade it received a year earlier and in 2012.

“Overall, the company paid more than its peers, but performed moderately worse than its peers,” wrote Glass Lewis, handing Goldman Sachs an “F” grade for linking its executive-pay practices to its performance.

The advisory service said Goldman paid its top executive more than the average of his peer group while the company performed moderately worse than its peers.

Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman’s chairman and CEO, received $23 million in salary and bonus for his 2013 performance. He is also eligible to earn another $6 million if the firm hits certain targets over several years.

Glass Lewis separately recommended that shareholders vote against the reelection of the pay committee’s chairman, James A. Johnson, to the firm’s board. The advisory firm said shareholders should use the proposed nomination of Mr. Johnson “to express their concern regarding the company’s compensation practices given that the failing grade for 2013 follows two consecutive years of the company earning a ‘D’ in our pay for performance analysis.”