Daily Archives: June 20, 2014


What will Ocwen do with its big pile of cash?

What will Ocwen do with its big pile of cash?

Ocwen to potentially venture outside of mortgage servicing

Ocwen Financial Services (OCN) is sitting on nearly $8 million in total assets, leaving the nonbank with a lot of spending power.

After recent meetings with William Erbey, chairman of Ocwen, and the newly appointed CFO, Michael Bourque,Compass Point Trading & Research said, “Ocwen has often mentioned it would consider expanding its business outside of distressed mortgage servicing and into businesses where it believes it can sustain a ‘sustainable competitive advantage.’”

“We believe the company is close to announcing it will be expanding into another area beyond mortgage servicing, such as title insurance or other consumer servicing. How it takes shape remains to be seen, but we would expect the new initiatives to be announced by 2Q14 earnings,” Compass Point added.   

BNY Mellon re-enters reverse mortgage business

Bank of New York Mellon is re-entering the reverse mortgage business after having exited it back it 2007. The bank is attempting to attract more business for the global custody bank’s asset management arm. Per Forbes:

The unit will purchase, securitize and service reverse mortgages and will also advise brokers, financial advisors, and asset managers on how to integrate reverse mortgages into retirement plans. This will in turn allow the bank to provide retirees with more options as a part of their retirement planning.

The U.S. retirement market forms an important part of BNY Mellon’s asset management business, with the bank ranking among the top 10 asset managers in this market. The bank’s decision to launch Home Equity Retirement Solutions will make it the only major bank to offer reverse mortgages to clients – a move clearly aimed at attracting more business in the near term. 

Source: Forbes

After Failing to Renew Unemployment Insurance, Congress Is a Culprit in Foreclosure Crisis | Commentary

After Failing to Renew Unemployment Insurance, Congress Is a Culprit in Foreclosure Crisis | Commentary


In the immediate aftermath of the nation’s 2008 foreclosure crisis, Congress played a constructive role in keeping Americans in their homes. Lawmakers supported loan modification programs and sweeping financial reforms, and — while many rightfully demanded more action — these efforts eased the effects of the crisis.

Today, the lingering effects of predatory lending and the Great Recession mean that foreclosures remain a serious problem in communities around the country. But, in the national fight to stop foreclosures, one crucial fact has changed: Congress is now a culprit.

By failing to extend emergency unemployment insurance benefits, House GOP leaders have unnecessarily thrust millions of Americans into financial hardship and many, in turn, into foreclosure.

Congress must again be part of the solution.

Lawmakers should immediately extend emergency UI benefits. But, if House GOP leaders continue their obstruction, the absolute least lawmakers can do is pass a measure to direct the Federal Housing Finance Agency to impose a six month moratorium on foreclosures for individuals who have lost UI due to congressional inaction.

Because of the GOP’s termination of the federal emergency UI program, more than 2.2 million Americans, including more than 200,000 veterans, have lost access to an essential lifeline that’s rightfully theirs. Unemployment insurance is not a hand-out. Americans who lost their jobs in one of the toughest job markets in memory have largely paid into the emergency compensation program through payroll taxes.

There’s simply no valid economic argument for failing to renew UI. The Census Bureau estimates that these benefits enabled 2.5 million people to get out of poverty in 2012 and enabled more than 11 million to do so since 2008. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, restoring benefits would result in 200,000 additional jobs this year by increasing consumer demand. The logic is simple: When unemployed Americans receive income, they spend it. When they can go out and purchase their necessities, they boost the economy and promote job-creation. All this boosts tax revenue and reduces deficits.

When you factor in the foreclosures that result from people unexpectedly losing their basic UI income, the social and economic impacts are immeasurably greater. Foreclosure and evictions are not only responsible for massive anxiety and suffering but also downward spirals in property values and tax revenue.

Restoring UI is not just a matter of sound policy making. It’s a matter of basic decency.

Citigroup’s Dark Pools: Here’s Why the Public Doesn’t Trust Wall Street

In 2008, the sprawling global bank, Citigroup, created under the controversial repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, blew itself up with toxic debt hidden in the dark in the Cayman Islands in an exotic framework called Structured Investment Vehicles or SIVs. The unwilling taxpayer was forced into servitude to bail out this hubris that had occurred at the hands of captured regulators, infusing $45 billion in equity, over $300 billion in asset guarantees, and $2.5 trillion in below-market loans.

At the time of its implosion, Citigroup had over 2,000 subsidiaries, affiliates or joint ventures, many of which operated in the dark in foreign locales.

Flash forward to today: in March, the Federal Reserve said Citigroup had flunked its stress test and the Fed prevented it from boosting its dividend. (The so-called stress test is how the Fed measures a mega bank’s ability to withstand a major economic upheaval.) In rejecting Citigroup’s capital plan for 2014, the Fed said that Citigroup

“reflected a number of deficiencies in its capital planning practices, including in some areas that had been previously identified by supervisors as requiring attention, but for which there was not sufficient improvement. Practices with specific deficiencies included Citigroup’s ability to project revenue and losses under a stressful scenario for material parts of the firm’s global operations.”

Most Americans, and, sadly, members of Congress, believe that Citigroup is the parent of all those branch banks holding FDIC-insured deposits across America and bearing that angelic red halo over the word “Citi.” But Citigroup is far more than that.

A recent record search by Wall Street On Parade suggests that Citigroup may be operating one of Wall Street’s largest collections of dark pools, trading stocks 24/7 around the globe in de facto unregulated stock exchanges which it operates under a dizzying array of different names.

Read complete article

Link Link

Whistleblower Says Citi Continues Reckless Mortgage Lending

Whistleblower Says Citi Continues Reckless Mortgage Lending

Case Title


Case Number



New York Southern

Law360, New York (June 19, 2014, 7:31 PM ET) — A vice president at Citigroup Inc.’s mortgage unit says it continues to engage in reckless lending and underwriting practices and make false claims about loan quality when applying for government insurance two years after paying over $158 million to settle similar claims, according to a whistleblower complaint unsealed last week.

Current CitiMortgage senior vice president and lending consultant Fengbo Zhang filed the qui tam complaint in New York federal court in January, alleging that the global bank’s loan officers routinely violate underwriting guidelines established by Fannie…





Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, seeking to determine the secured status of the second and third mortgages held by Wells Fargo on debtor’s principal residence. At issue was whether debtor can strip off a wholly unsecured junior mortgage in a Chapter 20 case. The court concluded that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) did not prohibit this result. Accordingly, the court affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s determination that debtor could strip off Wells Fargo’s second and third liens on the residence because they were wholly unsecured.



Urban Institute: Mortgage denials for black borrowers worse than thought

Urban Institute: Mortgage denials for black borrowers worse than thought

A Twitter fight broke out among industry leaders last month on whether African-American borrowers are denied at about 32% (within the historic norm) or as high as 56%, as claimed by the head of the largest mortgage banking trade association.

Turns out that by some measures, it might be actually worse, according to the Urban Institute and their reading of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data.

The analysts at Urban Institute say that when David Stevens, president and CEO of the Mortgage Bankers Association many, including Fannie Mae, responded that MBA’s numbers overestimated the denial rate for minorities, neither were right.

“But our numbers show that even the MBA’s denial rate underestimated the tightness of the GSE market,” Wei Li said. “Preserving the status quo of GSEs is not enough to provide needed credit to borrowers with weaker credit profiles, including many minority applicants.”

The MBA wants to reduce government involvement in the mortgage market and replace it with more private capital, which of course would come from MBA members, among others. Supporters of the GSEs say that they worry that dismantling the GSEs could restrict minorities’ access to credit.

After the Twitter fight, some said MBA was using data that resulted in a higher denial rate, as a way to show where the GSEs were already failing minority buyers.

From HMDA, it is possible to calculate the denial rate for all mortgage applicants, Wei points out. 

“However, HMDA does not include applicant credit profiles, a critical omission since applicants with a strong credit profile are unlikely to be denied. So the denial rate really only matters for weaker credit profile applicants,” he says.  “Including applicants who have no chance being denied in the denial rate calculation gives a false impression of what is happening in the mortgage market.  Denial rates for weaker credit profile applicants are much higher than the denial rates for all applicants.”

According to HMDA, at least 16% were denied GSE loans for purchase of an owner-occupied property in 2012.


Brian Moynihan may be taking a play out of Jamie Dimon’s book: BofA asks Holder to meet with its CEO – sources

Brian Moynihan may be taking a play out of Jamie Dimon’s book: BofA asks Holder to meet with its CEO – sources

Representatives of Bank of America Corp have asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to meet with Moynihan, its chief executive officer, in an attempt to resolve differences over a possible multibillion-dollar settlement involving shoddy mortgage securities sold by the second-largest U.S. bank and its units, according to people familiar with the negotiations.

Negotiators for Bank of America and the Justice Department have not met in more than a week and have no plans to do so after a flurry of meetings did not bring them close to a settlement amount, sources said.

Bank of America spokesman Lawrence Grayson and Justice Department spokeswoman Dena Iverson declined to comment.


Bank of America : Judge lets DoJ proceed with fraud case against Bank of America

Bank of America : Judge lets DoJ proceed with fraud case against Bank of America

Bad news for the bankster…

(Reuters) – A North Carolina judge ruled on Thursday that a Justice Department lawsuit against Bank of America Corp could move forward, allowing the complainant 30 days to file its amended petition.

The Department of Justice’s lawsuit accuses Bank of America of civil fraud in the sale of mortgage securities that soured during the global financial crisis.

“The court need not reach far outside the complaint or be an expert in economics to take notice that it was the trading of toxic RMBS between financial institutions that nearly brought down the banking system in 2008,” Cogburn wrote in an order.

At a hearing last week in Asheville, North Carolina, U.S. District Judge Max Cogburn said he would consider dismissing the lawsuit, saying the DoJ may not have the evidence to try this as a fraud case.

Cogburn had at that time also said he would consider allowing the DoJ to amend its complaint.