Daily Archives: July 15, 2014

Why Do Banksters Get Help but Not Homeowners?

The Homeowners Loan Act of 1933 need to be revised and updated today. The loan act in 1933 was  to refinance home mortgages that were in default or at risk of foreclosure due to the 1929 crash and the collapse of the housing industry. Sounds familiar to what happen in 2008? By the way, by 1934, about one in five mortgages in America were owned by the corporation. And how many loans today are owned by the government? About 60%. About 20% of the loans in this country are owned by the banks.

It’s time to start helping the people, and stop helping Wall Street.

According to an agreement announced earlier today, big bank Citigroup will pay $7 billion to settle a Department of Justice investigation into that bank’s involvement with risky subprime mortgages.

The agreement stems from Citigroup’s role in the trading of subprime mortgage securities, which helped to cause the 2007 financial collapse and Great Recession.

Of the $7 billion total settlement, $4 billion will be in the form of a civil monetary payment to the Department of Justice, $500 million will go to state attorney’s general and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and an additional $2.5 billion will go towards “consumer relief.”

But make no mistake about it. This agreement is another win for the big banks.

Under the agreement, Citigroup will most likely get a $500 million tax write-off. And in pre-market trading on Monday, Citigroup stocks rose by nearly 4 percent, despite the $7 billion agreement.

This is nothing more than a slap on the wrist for Citigroup; basically a cost of doing business.

And as for the mere $2.5 billion in consumer relief, while it will be going towards loan modifications, principal reduction and refinancing for distressed homeowners, it’s nowhere near enough. And there are no guarantees it will make its way into the hands of the people Citigroup victimized, either.

If the Department of Justice was serious about holding Citigroup accountable for its actions, and helping the American people and economy recover from the Great Recession, then it would be taking a heck of a lot more than $7 billion, and giving that money directly to the American people.

It would be helping out American homeowners, instead of continuing to protect the big banks.

After all, it’s consumers buying things like houses who drive demand and grow the economy. Not the big banks on Wall Street.

Read on.


Watch CNBC’s Rick Santelli nearly lose his mind talking inflation

Why is anyone with a brain would listen to Rick Santelli? Glad Steve Liesman has more sense.

Housing Wire:

During the “Fast Money Halftime Report,” the show’s panelists, which included CNBC’s Rick Santelli and Steve Liesman, were debating the Federal Reserve Bank’s policies and its role in the U.S. economy.

During the discussion, Santelli and Liesman became embroiled in a debate that left the traders behind Santelli applauding and catcalling and ultimately led Santelli to walk off the set.

The specific issue that launched Santelli’s one-sided shouting match was whether or not Fed policy is “behind the curve.” Santelli called on the Fed to act more like bankers and let the market dictate where interest rates should be.

The debate ultimately devolved into the aforementioned shouting match with the normally bespectacled Santelli removing his glasses and screaming into the camera.

Liesman, for his part, maintained his cool and landed the ultimate haymaker on Santelli.

“It’s impossible for you to have been more wrong, Rick,” Liesman said. “Your call for inflation, the destruction of the dollar, the failure of the U.S. economy to rebound…”

Liesman continues:

“Rick, it’s impossible for you to have been more wrong. Every single bit of advice you gave would have lost people money, Rick… There is no piece of advice that you’ve given that’s worked, Rick. Not a single one… The higher interest rates never came. The inability of the U.S. to sell bonds never happened. The dollar never crashed, Rick. There isn’t a single one that’s worked for you.”


SEC charges Ernst & Young with violating auditor independence



WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The Securities and Exchange Commission charged Ernst & Young on Monday with breaking auditor independence rules. The SEC said a subsidiary of the company lobbied congressional staff of behalf of two audit clients. Such lobbying activities are prohibited since they put the firm in the position of being an advocate for audit clients. Ernst & Young agreed to pay more than $4 million to settle the charges. No lawmaker was named by the SEC.