It’s been rumored and discussed for months, but now it’s one step closer to actually happening. The idea of theUnited States Postal Service offering banking services may have seem far-fetched when it was originally floated by the USPS earlier this year, but now there’s a legislative proposal that would authorize the USPS to do just that.
Last week, Representative Cedric Richmond (D-La.) followed through on a January white paper from the USPS’s Office of the Inspector General, which suggested that by allowing the post office to offer banking services, it could help communities that are currently underserved by banks.
In the white paper the USPS said, “postal financial services could complement the current offerings from banks by helping banks reach customers in geographic areas where they lack a physical presence, by offering products to customers who were not previously a main focus of banks, and by helping some customers transition to traditional bank savings or checking accounts.”
Posted in Uncategorized
The CFPB continues to ramp up its enforcement actions and its collaboration with state AG offices as part of the new “Operation Mis-Modification.”
The CFPB, the FTC and fifteen states announced a series of lawsuits against what they characterize as “foreclosure relief scammers.” The CFPB filed three lawsuits against individuals and companies – all law firms or associated with law firms – seeking compensation for victims, civil fines and injunctions. The FTC filed six lawsuits. And, in line with Director Cordray’s previous statements that the CFPB wascollaborating with state AG offices, the state AGs announced their intent to file 32 lawsuits. It is uncertain whether any of the state AG lawsuits will rely upon Section 1042 of Dodd-Frank, which, as we have previously reported, allows a state AG to bring a civil action for violation of the Dodd-Frank prohibition of unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices (UDAAP).
The CFPB alleges that the defendants used deceptive marketing to persuade thousands of consumers to pay them more than $25 million in illegal fees. The crux of the CFPB’s allegations are that these companies:
- Charged consumers with advance fees before obtaining a loan modification in violation of Regulation O (formerly known as the Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule);
- Misrepresented in marketing materials the likelihood they would help a consumer save substantial sums in mortgage payments;
- Tricked borrowers into thinking that they would receive legal representation even though many borrowers never spoke with an attorney or had their case reviewed by one; and
- Misled consumers to believe they were eligible for a loan modification or they would receive relief within a few short months when the defendants had not contacted the consumers’ lenders or requested or obtained any meaningful relief for them.
A JPMorgan Chase unit will pay $650,000 to resolve charges that it submitted inaccurate reports about the positions held by some of its large trader clients, the U.S. commodities regulator said on Tuesday.
Maurice “Hank” Greenberg, the former chairman of American International Group Inc. (AIG), must face trial in January after nine years of legal jousting over former New York attorney general Eliot Spitzer’s lawsuit alleging sham transactions intended to inflate the insurer’s financial health.
The lawsuit, now pursued by New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, has been assailed by Greenberg as without merit.
A New York state judge in Manhattan set the week of Jan. 19 as the start of trial.
Posted in Uncategorized
Moses B. Garner sold everything he had to pay back his bank customers.
Mr. Garner would not make it in today’s Wall Street environment and behavior… Moses B. Garner was a farmer, butcher, banker and San Bernardino, CA County Supervisor.
From Press Enterprise newpaper:
Moses B. Garner would have utterly failed in today’s Wall Street environment.
But as one of San Bernardino’s early bankers, Garner was a big success … twice.
In 1880, when his bank failed, instead of slipping quietly out of town or asking for a bailout, Garner paid his depositors back by selling most of his personal property, including his home.
It was a different time.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has launched an investigation into whether Credit Suisse misled investors in its “dark pool” trading platform, The Post has learned.
The investigation comes nearly a month after Schneiderman sued Barclays for allegedly lying about the presence of predatory traders lurking in its dark pool, an alternative trading system that is lightly regulated.
The UK bank has denied wrongdoing and last week filed a motion to dismiss the suit.
Credit Suisse is the operator of the largest bank dark pool in the US, accounting for about 14 percent of all trades, according to data from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Jamie Dimon, the chief executive of JPMorgan Chase, recently said, “I love America.” Lloyd Blankfein, the chief executive of Goldman Sachs, wrote an opinion article saying, “Investing in America still produces the best return.”
Yet guess who’s behind the recent spate of merger deals in which major United States corporations have renounced their citizenship in search of a lower tax bill? Wall Street banks, led by JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs.
Investment banks are estimated to have collected, or will soon collect, nearly $1 billion in fees over the last three years advising and persuading American companies to move the address of their headquarters abroad (without actually moving). With seven- and eight-figure fees up for grabs, Wall Street bankers — and lawyers, consultants and accountants — have been promoting such deals, known as inversions, to some of the biggest companies in the country, including the American drug giant Pfizer.
Just last week, President Obama criticized these types of transactions, calling the companies engaged in them “corporate deserters.” “My attitude,” he said, “is I don’t care if it’s legal. It’s wrong.” He has suggested legislation, and Senator Carl Levin, the Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, has proposed to make it more difficult for an American company to renounce its citizenship — and tax bill — by merging with a smaller foreign competitor.
Posted in Uncategorized
As WSJ reports,
New York’s banking regulator is pushing to install government monitors inside the U.S. offices of Deutsche Bank and Barclays as part of an intensifying investigation into possible manipulation in the foreign-exchange market, according to people familiar with the probe.
The state’s Department of Financial Services notified lawyers for the two European banks earlier this month that it wanted to install a monitor inside each firm, based on preliminary findings in the agency’s six-month currencies-market probe, these people said. Negotiations are continuing over the details of the monitors’ appointments, but New York investigators expect to reach an agreement soon.
The regulatory agency has selected Deutsche Bank and Barclays for extra scrutiny partly because the records it has collected so far from more than a dozen banks under its supervision point to the greatest potential problems at those two banks, the people said. Plus, Deutsche Bank and Barclays are among the dominant players in the vast foreign-exchange market, so investigators hope a close-up view into their businesses will help them observe other players and trading patterns, the people said.
A Barclays spokesman declined to comment; the U.K. bank previously has said it is cooperating with authorities. A Deutsche Bank spokesman said it is cooperating with investigators “and will take disciplinary action with regards to individuals if merited.”
Deutsche Bank and Barclays are among more than 10 banks that have fired or suspended dozens of senior executives, traders and others staff in connection with civil and criminal foreign-exchange probes in the U.S., U.K. and elsewhere.
The New York regulator envisions wide-ranging investigative roles for its monitors inside Deutsche Bank and Barclays, according to the people close to the probe. The monitors’ powers will include interviewing bank employees, clients and business partners, observing trading practices and compliance, and reviewing more records beyond what the banks already have supplied.
Law360, New York (July 29, 2014, 11:43 AM ET) — The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission on Tuesday charged J.P. Morgan Securities LLC with violating rules to accurately report positions held by large traders, even after the agency warned the firm to fix the problems.
The firm, a registered futures commission merchant and subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., agreed to pay $650,000 to settle the matter without admitting or denying wrongdoing, the CFTC said in an administrative order.
The so-called large trader reports require futures firms to make daily reports about the activity of their…