Daily Archives: April 9, 2016

A student op-ed: Clinton visits a Seattle high school, and student resentments surface

Ifrah Abshir is a senior attending Rainier Beach High School. She was featured in Gov. Jay Inslee’s “State of the State” address. Inspiring young girls to code, she addressed inequality in the computer science industry. She’s a newspaper editor and published writer.

By Ifrah Abashir, Occupy.com | Op-Ed

It was a typical Monday at Rainier Beach High School. Classes were quiet as usual at the start of the school week. Most students, including myself, were dragging our feet from class to class, counting down the minutes until 2:50 p.m.

Then, during third period, a classmate of mine shouted from the back of the room, “Hillary Clinton is coming to Rainier Beach tomorrow!” Instantly, the class swarmed to her, asking for her sources. At our school we are very politically aware and have discussions about presidential candidates nearly every week.

The news made us act as if we were two-year-olds force-fed several bottles of energy drinks. After about five minutes of yelling and pushing and begging for more info, we discovered that our classmate had received the news through Twitter. We instantly went to several other teachers asking for validation, but no one could confirm. They were all just as clueless as we were. Eventually a teacher asked the front office, and learned that it was true: Hillary was on her way.

Besides the administration, nobody in our school had been privy to this knowledge until it was too late to act on it. We, as students, should have a right to decide whether our school is used as a stage for a political candidate, especially if a lot of the students and staff do not think that a particular candidate has their best interests at heart.

At Rainier Beach, we share a genuine interest in politics, largely because we have to. Being a school with over 90% students of color and more than 70% on free and reduced lunch, most of the things being said in the political world right now affect us directly.

For instance, Donald Trump has publicly insulted Mexicans, Muslims, immigrants, and those who are less affluent. Essentially, he is insulting nearly all of our student population. He has also proposed several policies infringing on our rights as Americans which he threatens to implement if he becomes president. This incites fear in our hearts and forces us to watch the campaigns while praying that certain personalities do not get elected.

Which is why a lot of our students hold animosity towards Mrs. Clinton.

Ahlaam Ibraahim, a senior, said, “I don’t trust her because of her policies and how she’s always switching up. Something in my gut says she isn’t about what she states she is. It’s like she’s putting on a show for us.”

Another student, Naima Yusuf, said, “I’m still hung over her calling [gangs of kids in urban areas] ‘super predators’ and then saying they needed to be brought to heel. This was and is still super insulting to me.”

Still another student said, “I’m not really cool with her foreign policies and how she supports Israel indefinitely. The conflict in Palestine was a problem caused by western interference and by continuing to support the occupation, we are causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.”

On the subject of race, another said, “We are in a moment in time right now where the conversations we are having about race and identity are becoming prominent and necessary. I feel like Clinton doesn’t do a good enough job of stepping out of her comfort zone to address those problems. She’s really good at pointing fingers and acknowledging there is a problem, but not describing solutions that are intersectional.”

If so many of our students feel this way about Clinton, how do you expect they felt knowing that she was coming to our school the next day? We felt that using Rainier Beach over other high schools in Seattle was a strategic PR stunt by the Clinton campaign, considering most of our students are young people of color.

Yet despite all of our internal feelings and desire to act upon them, we got the news so late that there was nothing we could do but attend the rally and see what Hillary was about.

The next day, after school was over, we waited for hours to get into our own gym for the rally. We were tired, coming off a full school day, and our spirits were low because we felt like we were being sold for publicity without our consent. To add to that, in line we had offensive comments directed toward us. One woman approached us and said, “Can I take a photo with you guys so I can show people that I’m not afraid of Muslims?”

Another man and woman were snickering behind us, talking mess about our school and neighborhood. In that moment we felt like we did not belong because we were some of the only people of color in that long line, which wrapped three times around in the parking lot and onto the front of the school. Can you imagine feeling like you don’t belong in your own school?

After waiting for roughly three and a half hours, we realized there was a priority line for other people to get in first. So we waited even longer for them to get situated, then we finally made our way in and looked around.

People from Mrs. Clinton’s campaign were picking out the few people of color in attendance and asking them to stand in the bleachers behind Hillary so the crowd would look more diverse then it really was. It looked as if most people there had never stepped foot in the south end, let alone Rainier Beach.

In Clinton’s speech, given to students and staff, it was not about what she said but rather what she did not say. She didn’t mention what she would do for schools like ours. She didn’t talk about the school-to-prison pipeline. She didn’t talk about high incarceration rates. Rather, she talked about holistic ideals she had for the country.

Exactly as our students feared, Mrs. Clinton had a lot of filler talk, but not the hardcore conversations that are needed. She didn’t even allow for a question and answer session, and the only people that got to talk to her and take pictures were those in the priority line.

This explains why a lot of our students and staff appreciate Bernie so much: Sanders actually talks about things that matter to us. He has those uncomfortable conversations because he knows they’re needed. We appreciate Bernie because he knows our political and economic system right now only helps the rich get richer and the poor get poorer; that it only continues to be punitive and inconsiderate. This explains why he won the Washington state caucus on Mar. 26 by a sweeping majority.

You would have assumed that somebody from Hillary’s campaign might have informed her about our school before she chose to attend. They might have informed her about how socially active we are. How we continue to fight to achieve equity across our school district, the city and beyond. And how we aren’t afraid of calling things how we see them.

Maybe then she would have changed her speech to better address our concerns, and possibly even shifted our minds to get our vote.

Source: Truthout

Wall Street Should Pay a Sales Tax, Too


In case there was any doubt, the presidential election fight has confirmed that blasting Wall Street, even eight years after the financial crisis, is still a vote-getter.

Hillary Clinton has said she’d like to jail more bankers. Donald Trump has skewered the hedge fund managers who are “getting away with murder.” And Bernie Sanders has made Wall Street accountability a centerpiece of his campaign.

Of course, financial industry lobbyists aren’t about to take this lying down. In recent weeks, they’ve turned up the heat on lawmakers to block one particular measure that Sanders has mentioned in nearly every stump speech: taxing Wall Street speculation.

Americans are used to paying sales taxes on basic goods and services, like a spring jacket, a gallon of gas, or a restaurant meal. But when a Wall Street trader buys millions of dollars’ worth of stocks or derivatives, there’s no tax at all.

Sanders has introduced a bill called the Inclusive Prosperity Act, which would correct that imbalance by placing a small tax of just a fraction of a percent on all financial trades. It wouldn’t apply to ordinary consumer transactions such as ATM withdrawals or wire transfers.

Wall Street lobbyists are claiming that such taxes would still hurt mom-and-pop investors. The Investment Company Institute, which represents the trading arms of JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the leading hedge funds, recently fired off a letter to Congress arguing that a Wall Street speculation tax would “harm all investors, especially middle-income American workers saving for retirement.”

In reality, the type of tax Sanders is promoting would target the high rollers in the financial casino. Because the tax applies to every trade, it would hit the traders engaging in computerized split-second stock-flipping the hardest. That’s a good thing, because that kind of trading makes markets less stable and adds no real value to the Main Street economy.

For ordinary investors in low-turnover pension funds, the costs would be negligible — like a tiny insurance fee to protect against crashes caused by reckless and often automated speculation.

Under the Sanders plan, the tax rate would range from 0.005 percent to 0.5 percent, depending on the financial instrument. By contrast, ordinary sales taxes currently average 8.4 percent.

How Private Prison Companies Use Big Tax Breaks and Low Wages to Maximize Profit

The two largest private prison firms in the United States are exploiting a loophole in the tax code to secure millions of dollars in corporate tax breaks.

Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and GEO Group avoided a combined $113 million in federal income taxes in 2015 alone, according to an analysis of federal financial filings by the racial and economic justice group Enlace.

The prison business is booming despite efforts to reduce the nation’s prison population, which has exploded in recent decades and forced the government to contract with private prison companies to meet demand. Last year, CCA reported $222 million in net profits, and GEO Group reported $139 million.

CCA and GEO Group have enjoyed increased profits per prisoner housed in their facilities since 2012, when both companies began converting themselves into special real estate trusts that are exempt from the federal corporate income tax, at least in the eyes of the IRS.

Read on.

The Fourth Whistleblowers’ Lemons Award Goes to DOJ for Ignoring Citi’s Criminals

Can’t wait for another Lemon Award to DOJ in the recent $1.2 billion settlement with Wells Fargo in defrauding the government in underwriting in a mortgage case. No criminal indictments but a settlement!

By William K. Black

We could, of course, retire the Bank Whistleblowers United’s Lemons title – for ignoring or trivializing elite fraud – by awarding it permanently to the Department of Justice (DOJ).  The current award is particularly close to our hearts because it involves DOJ ignoring the sworn testimony of one our founders, Richard Bowen.  DOJ did not ignore Bowen’s testimony because it was discredited, but because it was proven accurate – and should have led to the indictment of Citigroup’s top leadership team.

Two recent revelations prompt the timing our Lemon award to DOJ.  First, it is five years since the release of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) report, so the criminal referrals that FCIC made were revealed.   Citigroup’s senior managers were the subject of two, separate criminal referrals by FCIC.  One of those two referrals was based on Bowen’s testimony.  (Bowen’s explosive interview by FCIC’s staff was also made public.)   The mainstream press has ignored the referral based on Bowen’s testimony.

Continue reading

The Myth that Obama’s Taking Huge Contributions from Wall Street Was Fine

Professor Bill Black is now Sen. Bernie Sanders’ economic adviser. Bravo!

By William K. Black
April 7, 2016     Bloomington, MN

I am now officially an economic advisor to Senator Sanders, and this column reflects some of that advice.  Part of my advice is not to take money from Wall Street felons.   (I am not taking credit for Bernie’s decision — at most I supported a decision he had already made over a year ago.)  One of the reasons I reinforced Bernie’s decision was witnessing the problems President Obama experienced given his taking very large contributions from Wall Street.  I channeled the prescient warning that Professor Thomas Ferguson (U. Mass, Boston) gave a group of us in 2008.  He predicted, accurately, that Obama would not lead an effective crackdown on the endemic fraud by Wall Street elites that caused the financial crisis.  Tom (he is a personal friend) is the expert on campaign finance.  He authored the classic book on campaign finance entitled Golden Rule (as in the observation that he that has the gold makes the rules.).

Continue reading

Wells Fargo settles mortgage case for $1.2B, admitted to deceiving the government with “years of reckless underwriting.”

Yet, no one is criminally charged despite the bank admitting wrongdoing..

April 8 – Wells Fargo & Co admitted to deceiving the U.S. government into insuring thousands of risky mortgages, as it formally reached a record $1.2 billion settlement of a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit.

The settlement with Wells Fargo, the largest U.S. mortgage lender and third-largest U.S. bank by assets, was filed on Friday in Manhattan federal court. It also resolves claims against Kurt Lofrano, a former Wells Fargo vice president.

According to the settlement, Wells Fargo “admits, acknowledges, and accepts responsibility” for having from 2001 to 2008 falsely certified that many of its home loans qualified for Federal Housing Administration insurance.

The San Francisco-based lender also admitted to having from 2002 to 2010 failed to file timely reports on several thousand loans that had material defects or were badly underwritten, a process that Lofrano was responsible for supervising.

Read on.