A pair of banks based in Ohio must begin increasing mortgage lending in minority neighborhoods in certain areas of Ohio and Indiana as part of a settlement with theDepartment of Justice, which accused the banks of “redlining.”
The DOJ defines redlining as a “discriminatory practice by banks or other financial institutions of denying or avoiding providing credit services to consumers because of the racial demographics of the neighborhood in which the consumer lives.”
In this case, the DOJ accused Union Savings Bank and Guardian Savings Bank, which are based in Cincinnati and share common ownership and management, of redlining “predominantly African-American” neighborhoods in Cincinnati; Columbus, Ohio; Dayton, Ohio; and Indianapolis.
The complaint alleged that from at least 2010 through 2014, the banks extended credit to the residents of predominantly white neighborhoods to a “significantly greater extent” than they extended credit to majority African-American neighborhoods in the same cities.
ORLANDO, Fla. – 9 Investigative reporter Nancy Alvarez looked into more than a dozen potentially dangerous eyesore homes in Orlando, at the center of a federal complaint.
The complaint involves homes owned by Bank of America in predominately African-American and Latino neighborhoods.
Neighbors told Eyewitness News one of the homes in the Holden Heights neighborhood is a disaster and not much has been done to fix it since 2012.
“It allows all types of illicit activity — that’s a problem,” said community organizer Thomas Alston.
The city of Orlando is part of a national effort to hold banks accountable for foreclosed properties that fall into disrepair.
Eyewitness News found out many of the federal complaint claims fall predominantly in African-American and Latino neighborhoods.
CFPB, DOJ accuse bank of having “explicitly discriminatory denial policy”
BancorpSouth will pay $10.6 million to settle charges against the bank by theDepartment of Justice and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which accused the Mississippi-based bank of redlining and discriminatory lending practices.
According to a joint release from the CFPB and the DOJ, the agencies accused BancorpSouth of a number of discriminatory practices, including illegally redlining in Memphis; denying the mortgage loan applications of certain African-Americans more often than similarly situated non-Hispanic white applicants; charging African-American customers more for certain mortgage loans than non-Hispanic white borrowers with similar loan qualifications; and implementing an “explicitly discriminatory loan denial policy.”
First Federal Bank of Kansas City agreed to a $2.8 million settlement over charges that the bank excluded minority neighborhoods from its lending service area, a practice commonly known as redlining.
According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, First Federal Bank of Kansas City allegedly redlined several neighborhoods where the majority of the residents are African-American, thereby limiting residential mortgage lending to persons based upon their race, which is a violation of the Fair Housing Act.
The settlement agreement stems from two complaints filed on Oct. 5, 2015 by two fair housing groups that accused First Federal Bank of Kansas City of redlining.
The groups, the nonprofit organizations Metropolitan St. Louis Equal Housing and Opportunity Council and Legal Aid of Western Missouri, alleged that the bank’s lack of market penetration in African-American communities in the urban core (East Side) of Kansas City, Missouri made residential real estate products less available to people based on race.
Third of a series
GALLUP, N.M. — After a few years living with her sister, Rose Mary Zunie, 59, was ready to move into a place of her own.
So, on an arid Saturday morning this past summer, the sisters piled into a friend’s pickup truck and headed for a mobile-home sales lot here just outside the impoverished Navajo reservation.
The women — one in a long, colorful tribal skirt, another wearing turquoise jewelry, a traditional talisman against evil — were steered to a salesman who spoke Navajo, just like the voice on the store’s radio ads.
He walked them through Clayton-built homes on the lot, then into the sales center, passing a banner and posters promoting one subprime lender: Vanderbilt Mortgage, a Clayton subsidiary. Inside, he handed them a Vanderbilt sales pamphlet.
“Vanderbilt is the only one that finances on the reservation,” he told the women.
His claim, which the women caught on tape, was a lie. And it was illegal.
CINCINNATI (CN) – Fifth Third Bank allowed auto dealers to hike interest rates on car loans to black and Hispanic buyers, the Justice Department claims in a lawsuit.
According to a complaint filed in Federal Court on Monday, the bank’s policy was done “in a hidden manner not based on the borrower’s creditworthiness or other objective criteria related to borrower risk.”
The lawsuit says the bank’s policy was done “in a hidden manner not based on the borrower’s creditworthiness or other objective criteria related to borrower risk.”
An investigation by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau revealed the policy has been in effect as far back as 2010.
The agency says Fifth Third’s “lack of compliance monitoring” meant “the average African-American victim was obligated to pay over $200 more during the term of the loan because of discrimination, and the average Hispanic victim was obligated to pay over $200 more during the term of the loan because of discrimination.”
We heard this story before.. Wells Fargo still is repeated offender in redlining…Court document is linked to the article…
Oakland is accusing Wells Fargo Bank of systematic predatory lending to minorities.
In a federal lawsuit filed last week, the city alleges that the bank targeted blacks and Latinos, steering them toward risky, likely-to-fail loans — the kind that caused many families to lose their homes in the ongoing foreclosure crisis.
Oakland City Attorney Barbara Parker says the city has collected proof, including the testimony of former Well Fargo employees, suggesting the bank intentionally gave more expensive loans to African-American and Latino residents. Parker says minorities with good credit were given bad loans, in contrast to loans given to white borrowers with the same credit and income.
“Some of the testimony that we have gotten indicates that they felt that these borrowers were less sophisticated,” Parker says. “In some cases there’s comments that they thought they were less intelligent. It’s hard to imagine that being the case today, but in effect that’s what happened over years.”